|
Post by [CW]Warhog on Jun 19, 2009 22:45:03 GMT -5
There have been complaint that it is unfair that an admin working hard and another not doing anything to both be keeping as admins. It make it pointless to work hard if other admin are not doing much and are kept as admin. Should we kick admins out even though they haven't done anything wrong?
poll correction: "less active* admins"
|
|
|
Post by kris10 on Jun 20, 2009 20:05:03 GMT -5
Hm... Less active, more active, I can understand how you could see how it wouldn't be fair for the more active admin, but an admin is still an admin... Though I really hate bugging the more active admin(s) to come in and deal with somebody because the less active admins aren't on. Because I feel like I bug that/those admin/s too much and it's true, it isn't very fair for them.
I know I haven't played Halo in a week but that's now I felt before my leave of absence and that's most likely how I will continue to feel now that I'm home and will get to start playing again.
|
|
Arrow
New Member
So it begins.
Posts: 28
|
Post by Arrow on Jun 20, 2009 22:22:30 GMT -5
Kiroshima and Speedy both reportedly "quit" their duty. It isn't the "less active" admins among those of us that remain, but those two in particular, that would be relieved. I say, by all means yes. If they don't wish to be admins then don't let us burden them.
|
|
|
Post by ~Tweak on Jul 20, 2009 19:27:24 GMT -5
well, just a thought... but i wouldnt mind becoming an admin! im always on the server, its basically the only server i go in.. and im responsible
just thought i'd give that a shot since those two Arrow listed that "quit" their duty..
|
|
|
Post by ~Tweak on Aug 13, 2009 13:06:05 GMT -5
guess not
|
|
|
Post by kiroshima on Aug 13, 2009 17:35:04 GMT -5
lets not kick kiroshima! XD
|
|